|
Content
Pricing - NAPNOCThis page is an extract from the full topic guidance on Pricing – No Acceptable Price, No Contract (NAPNOC) [44KB PDF]. It details any Constraints associated with Pricing - NAPNOC, provides a summary of the Authoritative Guidance and lists any essential reading, further reading or associated documents. If you have any queries on this topic, please contact the Sponsor by email: DGDC CS-2A-Asst-Hd. ConstraintsNone. Authoritative Guidance SummaryThe policy of 'No Acceptable Price, No Contract' (NAPNOC) seeks to replicate in the non-competitive environment some of the competitive pressures of the market place, where prices are agreed before contracts are placed. NAPNOC is to be applied in all non-competitive procurements, including requirements valued at less than 1M (one million pounds sterling). Any exceptions must be fully justified in the submission seeking approval. An acceptable price in the context of the NAPNOC initiative means a FIRM, FIXED or Maximum Price (the latter employed as part of a Target Cost Incentive Fee arrangement) that is agreed before the contract is placed. The rate of profit in NAPNOC contracts should be based upon the Government Profit Formula unless contractors are able to substantiate a case for a higher rate of profit. The Invitation to Tender (ITT) for NAPNOC contracts must include the following DEFCONs:
NAPNOC prices should be agreed by reference to the principles incorporated in the Government Profit Formula Agreement (1968) including Equality of Information (E of I) - now carried forward in the 2003 Profit Formula Agreement. This is achieved by agreement and signature of the E of I Pricing Statement before contract award. Essential ReadingPricing - Equality Of Information topic Pricing - Price Fixing DEFCON 643 topic Pricing - Government Profit Formula topic Further ReadingPricing - CAAS Estimates topic Pricing - Target Cost Incentive Fee (TCIF) topic National Audit Report into Non-competitive Procurement in the MOD Public Accounts Committee report (29th Report of Sessions 2001-02, HC 370)
Change History
Change History
|